AUTHORITYDiscuss a pilot
Menu
EVIDENCE AND AUDIT
A decision should be explainable after the agent acts.
Exact-action authority evidence records what was proposed, whose limits applied, why the action was denied or authorised and what the recipient checked. It is designed to support review without turning a broad identity claim into blanket permission.
Risk, audit, security, procurement and operations teams evaluating evidence requirements for consequential AI-agent workflows.
CURRENT BOUNDARY
What it can genuinely support today.
- The fictional walkthrough displays the proposed amount, authority ceiling and resulting decision.
- An authorised outcome is described as bound to exact recorded terms rather than to a reusable general instruction.
- Recipient verification is a separate step, so the recipient need not rely on the agent's summary alone.
- Changed terms and replayed evidence are rejected in the public scenario.
- A controlled pilot would define retention, identifiers, human accountability and downstream audit correlation for the selected workflow.
- The public website does not expose a production ledger, customer audit records or cryptographic protocol specification.
- Decision evidence does not prove delivery, acceptance, execution, underlying real-world truth or legal effect.
- Evidence design must be reviewed against the legal, security, privacy and retention requirements of each deployment.